Choosing Discomfort: How Deliberate Action Can Set You Free
- Steven Norrell

- 7 days ago
- 4 min read
Periods of stagnation—commonly described as being “stuck in a rut”—are a widespread human experience characterized by fatigue, doubt, and diminished agency. This article examines the psychological, behavioral, and socio-economic mechanisms that sustain ruts, and argues that deliberate, voluntary discomfort is a primary catalyst for lasting change.
Drawing on research in behavioral psychology, real-world case studies, and historical examples, this work proposes that freedom is not achieved by avoidance of discomfort, but by choosing it early and intentionally. The decision to act precedes motivation, clarity, and confidence. The process begins now—one way or the other.
1. Introduction: The Question That Changes Everything
If you are stuck in a rut—tired, doubtful, and uninspired—there comes a moment that cannot be postponed indefinitely:
Is this where you want to stay?
This question appears simple, yet it exposes a critical truth: remaining in a rut is rarely the result of a single failure or external limitation. More often, it is the cumulative effect of unchallenged habits, deferred decisions, and the quiet refusal to relinquish what is familiar.
Across cultures and professions, people frequently ask how to “live their dream life.” The answers vary in form but converge in substance. The barriers that prevent freedom are rarely hidden. They are visible, known, and protected—often because they provide comfort, identity, or short-term security.
2. Understanding the Rut: Psychological and Structural Factors
2.1 Habitual Entrenchment
Behavioral science shows that humans are strongly biased toward maintaining existing patterns, even when those patterns produce dissatisfaction. This phenomenon, known as status quo bias, explains why individuals often remain in unfulfilling jobs, relationships, or lifestyles despite clear alternatives.
Neurologically, habits reduce cognitive load. Familiar routines require less energy than novel actions, making stagnation metabolically efficient—even when it is emotionally costly.
2.2 Fear of Loss Over Desire for Gain
Research in prospect theory demonstrates that people experience losses more intensely than equivalent gains. As a result, the fear of giving something up—income stability, social approval, predictable routines—often outweighs the potential benefits of change.
This explains a recurring pattern:
The very things people want freedom from are often the things they refuse to release.
3. The Central Claim: Breaking Out Requires Tremendous Action
Breaking out of a rut does not occur gradually through passive insight alone. It requires tremendous action—defined here as behavior that meaningfully disrupts existing patterns.
There is no alternative path.
Incremental thinking may improve comfort within the rut, but it rarely dissolves it. Transformation occurs only when action exceeds the threshold of familiarity.
3.1 Action Precedes Clarity
Contrary to popular advice, clarity does not come before action. It follows it.
Entrepreneurs, artists, athletes, and reformers consistently report that decisive action—often taken before confidence was present—produced the clarity they later attributed to planning.
Real-world example:
Sara Blakely, founder of Spanx, began her company without industry experience, external validation, or certainty. Her clarity about the product and market emerged only after repeated uncomfortable actions: pitching, failing, refining, and persisting.
4. Choosing Discomfort Before It Is Forced
A defining difference between those who break free and those who remain stuck lies in timing.
Discomfort arrives in every life. The only variable is whether it is chosen or imposed.
4.1 Voluntary vs. Involuntary Discomfort
Voluntary discomfort includes taking risks, learning new skills, ending misaligned commitments, and stepping into uncertainty by choice.
Involuntary discomfort arrives as burnout, economic pressure, health crises, or forced transitions.
Those who choose discomfort early retain agency. Those who delay are often compelled to change under far harsher conditions.
Historical example:
Many workers displaced during large-scale economic shifts (e.g., automation or industry collapse) experienced severe hardship because adaptation occurred reactively rather than proactively. In contrast, individuals who voluntarily re-skilled before necessity maintained continuity and control.
5. The Discomfort–Freedom Exchange
The relationship between discomfort and freedom is not linear, but it is reliable.
Initially, increased discomfort produces anxiety, instability, and resistance. Over time, however, that same discomfort—when aligned with purposeful action—creates competence, resilience, and expanded choice.
This pattern is observable across domains:
Physical training: Muscular adaptation occurs only through stress.
Education: Cognitive growth requires grappling with confusion.
Economic mobility: Financial independence often demands short-term sacrifice.
When discomfort is sustained by intention, it transforms. What once felt threatening becomes empowering.
6. The Decision Point: It Starts Now
Every individual reaches a threshold moment. Not a dramatic event, but a quiet internal decision.
One way, or the other.
Either discomfort is increased deliberately, in service of freedom—or discomfort accumulates passively, until circumstances enforce change.
The decision does not require perfection, certainty, or permission. It requires action that breaks pattern.
7. Conclusion: A Call to LIVE BIG
If you are tired and doubtful, recognize this as information—not a verdict.
You are not stuck because you are incapable. You are stuck because something familiar has not yet been released.
Freedom is not granted. It is constructed through chosen discomfort, sustained action, and an unwillingness to remain where growth has ended.
The process begins the moment the decision is made.
LIVEBIG 🌍Let’s make it happen.











Comments